Is Your Marriage Going to Last? – Understanding the Expression of Contempt

February 16, 2012 in Assessing Individuals

In Malcolm Gladwell’s book, Blink, he talks about research done by John Gottman, a man who could, after watching just a three-minute video clip of a newly married couple, determine if their marriage would last or not.  His success rate was staggering.  After spending years conducting marriage counseling and research, his success in predicting success in marriage came down to his ability to recognize the emotion of contempt during conversations with the couple.

But what is contempt?  When you feel morally superior to someone, you feel contempt towards them.  When a person does something, says something, or their physical presence is offensive to you, but not in the same way as disgust, you are feeling contempt.  Continue reading »

A Look That Could Kill – Understanding the Expression of Anger

January 24, 2012 in Assessing Individuals

Think about something or someone that has angered you recently.  It may be a coworker that annoys you, it may be a company’s customer service rep that you had to deal with on the phone, it may have been a person standing in front of you in line and, despite the ten minutes it took to get to the counter, they still didn’t know what they wanted to order.  Often times your anger towards the person after the fact or after the event has ended and you replay the scene over and over in your head, each time you re-imagine it, your anger towards the person deepens.  You are probably thinking about what you should have said to them or what you would say to them if you were in that situation again.

You don’t even need to be at the scene that initially caused your anger, but you can recreate that emotion in your head at any time and it is likely causing the expression of anger to be displayed across your face.

Anger is one of the 7 Universal Emotions that Dr. Paul Ekman identified through his research that began in the 1950’s.  If you think about anger in your daily life, you may have seen it before in arguments between people and regardless of the type of disagreement; you have often seen it during or preceding fights.  For Marines while we are deployed, a fight can mean getting shot at, finding an IED in the road, having a suicide bomber walk up to us, or being called to a riot that is forming.  For the military and police, fights and anger can have very serious implications and that make anger necessary to understand.
Continue reading »

Who Ripped One? Understanding The Expression of Disgust.

January 9, 2012 in Assessing Individuals

Look at a person who is near you right now and imagine that they just ripped a loud fart that you brings words like “horrendous” or “revolting” to your mind.  I’m talking about the kind of fart that is so repulsive that it could clear the room,  the kind of fart that turns your stomach just a little bit.  As you look at that person and judge what kind of person they are, I want you to freeze your face and notice the facial muscles that have been engaged in response to the event.
Continue reading »

Is That What Your Face Always Looks Like?

January 5, 2012 in Assessing Individuals

Everything starts with a baseline.  Over the next two weeks, there will be a post on each of the 7 Universal Emotions that were identified by Paul Ekman and since confirmed by a number of different researchers from both within the government as well as independent scientists. However if you don’t first establish a working baseline for a person, you will never be able to recognize changes in the facial expressions of those around you.

To keep this simple, we are going to divide the face into three separate and distinct areas that we will use to break down and establish a baseline for each person we are observing.  We will look at the upper, middle and lower portions of the face.
Continue reading »

Is the Face Worth Studying?

December 13, 2011 in Assessing Individuals

Over the next few weeks, you are going to see a number of posts here on the site that are focused on furthering our understanding of the human face and what if can offer us as Profilers. For a long time in our course, we only provided a minimal amount of information about what the face reveals due to the fact there are some serious limitations involved in this study that we had to take into consideration.

1. To observe someone’s face, you usually have to be pretty close to the person, going against our principle that “Proximity Negates Skill.” Whenever possible, we advise students to observe an area or a group of people with as much standoff as possible to limit the potential threats that are out there. The closer we have to be in order to recognize someone who plans on doing harm to us, the less skill he needs to actually inflict that harm.

2.Often times true expressions are displayed on the face in what are referred to as micro-expressions. As the name implies, micro-expressions are only displayed on the face for only an extremely short amount of time. Paul Ekman identifies micro-expressions as those that last less than 1/5 of a second (Emotions Revealed, page 15). Without having any video playback capability on patrol, it can be difficult to identify these expressions in real time, limiting our ability to apply any instruction or information we may gain from learning about the face.

Even with these limitations, the face can offer a great deal of information that will help us make better decisions and become more proactive in the face of our enemies.
Continue reading »

Behavioral Profiling on a Daily Basis

November 24, 2011 in Assessing Individuals

I was recently in San Francisco for an academic conference. Hundreds of book publishing companies come to the conference to sell their most recent publications related to the various fields of study connected to the conference. Because the publishing companies and reps are there, this means two main opportunities for students and scholars: buy books at a discount and pitch ideas to publishers for their next book. Well, I just so happened to be sitting at a table by myself, minding my own business, when an aspiring scholar and a book representative sat down to talk. From the get-go, it was apparent that the scholar was attempting to pitch an idea to the publishing representative. And, from the get-go, it was also apparent that he was headed for rejection, and possibly disaster. Continue reading »

Understanding Body Language: Interested vs. Uninterested

November 18, 2011 in Assessing Individuals

The foundation of any behavioral analysis program begins with a deep understanding of what a person is conveying through their nonverbal communication.  Tying the domains Kinesics and Biometrics together allow us to quickly make decisions about a person’s intentions, capabilities and emotions.

The six clusters that we use to classify an individual’s behavior (DominantSubmissiveness, UncomfortableComfortable, Interested, Uninterested) are the science behind our observations.  With all of these clusters, don’t forget about the Combat Rule of 3’s – that we are going to look for three indicators that all lead to the same cluster before we make a decision.  If you have the science part of the observation down, you are ready to apply the art of the observation and decide if that cluster you have identified fits the baseline or is an anomaly.

Once we make our observation, we are going to compare that conclusion to our baseline. I want to know if my conclusion fits my baseline, a FIT, or does not fit my baseline, a NO FIT. If the cluster is a NO FIT, I now have an anomaly that I want to investigate and attempt to figure out why that person does not fit in.

The following are gestures on the body that I would put into the “Interested vs. Uninterested” Cluster.

Continue reading »

Understanding Body Language: Submissiveness

November 16, 2011 in Assessing Individuals

The foundation of any behavioral analysis program begins with a deep understanding of what a person is conveying through their nonverbal communication.  Tying the domains Kinesics and Biometrics together allow us to quickly make decisions about a person’s intentions, capabilities and emotions.

The six clusters that we use to classify an individual’s behavior (Dominant, Submissiveness, Uncomfortable, Comfortable, Interested, Uninterested) are the science behind our observations.  With all of these clusters, don’t forget about the Combat Rule of 3’s – that we are going to look for three indicators that all lead to the same cluster before we make a decision.  If you have the science part of the observation down, you are ready to apply the art of the observation and decide if that cluster you have identified fits the baseline or is an anomaly.

The Submissive Cluster

The Submissive Cluster is the exact opposite of the Dominant Cluster and shows the absence of the “fight” response.  A submissive person may have decided that their best chance for survival is to not put up a fight and to not further anger the person who has asserted their dominance.  This cluster is identified by people who have unconsciously attempted to make themselves appear smaller, open, and non-threatening.  Seeing three of the indicators below can lead to make a determination of “Submissive.”

Lower Body

–       Seated – feet and legs crossed and tucked underneath chair (making themselves look smaller)

–       Seated – feet wrapped around legs of chair (seeking stability and security)

–       Legs will often not be used as barrier as it could offend the dominant person, unless person is in a self-protect mode

Upper Body

–       Leaning forward, making their body smaller and less threatening

–       Torso could be open and exposed if the submissiveness is in a non-threatening situation such as interacting with a boss

–       Arms pulled in (non-threatening, pulling arms in)

–       Wrists exposed in greeting (vulnerable) open palms show that there is no threat

–       Shoulders lowered (protecting carotid artery)

–       May show closed off indicators and protection indicators from uncomfortable cluster if trying to protect themselves

Other Indicators

–      Facial expressions of fear, sadness, or “fake” happiness

–       Forced smiles, movement only with the mouth and not the eyes

–       People will remain fairly motionless, to not attract any unnecessary attention and reduce the chances of being seen (elements of freeze response)

–       Gaze will be away from the person as to not offend them, staring is a sign of dominance

–       Eyes may be wide, signaling vulnerability while also showing cues of fear

–       Person may be pale

Understanding Body Language: Dominance

November 16, 2011 in Assessing Individuals

The foundation of any behavioral profiling program begins with a deep understanding of what a person is conveying through their nonverbal communication.  Tying the domains Kinesics and Biometrics together allow us to quickly make decisions about a person’s intentions, capabilities and emotions.

The six clusters that we use to classify an individual’s behavior (Dominant, Submissiveness, Uncomfortable, Comfortable, Interested, Uninterested)  are the science behind our observations.  With all of these clusters, don’t forget about the Combat Rule of 3’s – that we are going to look for three indicators that all lead to the same cluster before we make a decision.  If you have the science part of the observation down, you are ready to apply the art of the observation and decide if that cluster you have identified fits the baseline or is an anomaly.

The Dominant Cluster

The Dominant Cluster is the manifestation of the limbic system’s “fight response.”  Even though we are rarely in situations that require an actual fight, the Dominant Cluster is how we use our body to intimidate someone else or when we want to be perceived as being in control of the situation.  The key driving force of the dominant cluster is an observation about how much space the person is taking up.  This will be seen when a person tries to show his authority by requiring a great deal larger of an area for his presence.  This is a form of territoriality.  Seeing three of the indicators below can lead to make a determination of “Dominant.”

Lower Body

–       Seated – Feet planted on floor, feet and legs splayed out (taking up space)

–       Seated – Legs crossed (if uninterested to block himself from the person)

–       Seated – Legs crossed with hands on ankle or lower calf – secure and confident in their position

–       Standing – legs shoulder width apart (taking up more space)

Torso

–       Seated – Leaning back with hands clasped behind head (taking up more space)

–       Standing – Hands on hips – authoritative (taking up more space)

–       Standing – leaning forwards – aggressive, making themselves look bigger

–       Standing – Stretching torso and making oneself look taller by standing upright and erect, this can be complemented with their chin up and the chest thrust out

Hands and Arms

–       Arms Spread out on an object (table, counter, etc.) – (taking up more space)

–       Hands clasped behind back – (judging or evaluating)

–       “Wrist Down” when shaking hands/greeting

–       While talking – lecturing (pointing with hands)

–       Steeple gesture with hands (perceived as intellectual and confident), if also touching the lips it may be evaluating

Other Indicators

–       The facial expressions of anger, contempt, disgust, and happiness

–       Maintain gaze for longer period of time, doesn’t avert their gaze

–       Dominant people may breach other’s “intimate” Proxemic zone, showing they feel they can go wherever they want

–       They may initiate touching with others to show they are in charge

–       They may try to break society’s accepted rules to show that they make the rules such as swearing in public

–       It isn’t the ownership of status symbols that show wealth or power, but the flaunting of them or attempts to draw your attention to them makes it dominant

–       They might walk down the direct middle of a path, forcing and expecting people to move out of their way by demonstrating that they are not going to move

–       Ignoring a “no” response from someone

–       Belittling and criticizing a person

–       Interrupting the conversation

–       Ignoring someone else’s presence or their part of the conversation

–       Face may be flushed if preparing to fight and nostrils may flare

–       If evaluating, may be looking over the top of their glasses, pursing their lips or holding their chin in their hands

What Are You Telling Me?

November 11, 2011 in Assessing Individuals

The goal of profiling is to create better intelligence, intelligence that we can use.  All of the profiling domains that we focus our instruction on are designed to help us in two areas.  The first and most important focus is on identifying threats before that action takes place.  The second is to help us collect information about the people and the area we are operating in.

Continue reading »

Understanding Body Language: Comfortable

November 6, 2011 in Assessing Individuals

The foundation of any behavioral analysis program begins with a deep understanding of what a person is conveying through their nonverbal communication.  Tying the domains Kinesics and Biometrics together allow us to quickly make decisions about a person’s intentions, capabilities and emotions.

The six clusters that we use to classify an individual’s behavior (Dominant, Submissiveness, Uncomfortable, Comfortable, Interested, Uninterested) are the science behind our observations.  With all of these clusters, don’t forget about the Combat Rule of 3’s – that we are going to look for three indicators that all lead to the same cluster before we make a decision.  If you have the science part of the observation down, you are ready to apply the art of the observation and decide if that cluster you have identified fits the baseline or is an anomaly.

The following are gestures on the body that I would put into the “Comfortable” Cluster.

The Comfortable Cluster

The Comfortable Cluster is the absence of the flight response and shows that the person does not perceive any threat.  This relaxed and open posture is what people likely display for most of the day and will shift out of it to Uncomfortable, Dominant, or Submissive as the area around them changes and they no longer feel safe.

Lower Body

–       Feet motionless and relaxed (no limbic system response causing them to distance themselves from the threat)

–       Feet oriented towards the person (no limbic system preparation to distance themselves from the threat)

–       Legs uncrossed or legs crossed with the inside of the thigh exposed to the person (no limbic system response to protect vital areas and the femoral artery on the inside of the thigh)

–       Standing with legs crossed (no threat perceived, body vulnerable while it is standing with all the weight on one foot, body not prepared to fight/flight)

Upper Body

–       Torso upright or leaning in (no threat perceived, not concerned about distancing)

–       Torso leaning away or splayed out (in a reclined or lounging type manner, body not prepared to defend itself)

–       Arms open – at the sides of the body, gesturing openly, or behind back (no immediate threat recognized and need to use hands/arms to protect the body)

–       Shoulders lowered and relaxed – no turtle effect (no threat recognized, no need to protect vial areas of neck)

–       No pacifying behaviors.

–       Illustrators likely used in speech, but are open and gentle, not sudden or tense

Other Indicators

–       If arms or legs are crossed, they are done so in a relaxed manner, different than being closed

–       Generally will not have any body tension as muscles should be relaxed and loose

–       Person should seem happy or unconcerned overall

–       Gaze will be relaxed with minimal blinking

–       Eyebrows stable, only moving with speech, showing a relaxed forehead

–       Breathing slow and steady

–       Skin is a normal color, not reddened or pale

Understanding Body Language: Uncomfortable

November 6, 2011 in Assessing Individuals

The foundation of any behavioral analysis program begins with a deep understanding of what a person is conveying through their nonverbal communication.  Tying the domains Kinesics and Biometrics together allow us to quickly make decisions about a person’s intentions, capabilities and emotions.

The six clusters that we use to classify an individual’s behavior (Dominant, Submissiveness, Uncomfortable, Comfortable, Interested, Uninterested) are the science behind our observations.  With all of these clusters, don’t forget about the Combat Rule of 3’s – that we are going to look for three indicators that all lead to the same cluster before we make a decision.  If you have the science part of the observation down, you are ready to apply the art of the observation and decide if that cluster you have identified fits the baseline or is an anomaly.

The following are gestures on the body that I would put into the “Uncomfortable” Cluster.  Continue reading »

Why We Observe In Clusters

October 31, 2011 in Assessing Individuals

When it comes to observing body language and biometric cues, we want to stress the absolute imperative that we have as observers to put behavioral indicators together into clusters.  Because gestures have different meaning in different contexts, we have to be cautious in the conclusions that we come to.  One body language indicator alone does not tell us anything, but if you can identify a cluster of 3 kinesic or biometric cues all leading you to that same conclusion, you can increase the likelihood of your success.  In his book What Every Body Is Saying, Joe Navarro talks about “the more pieces of the puzzle you posses, the better your chances of putting them all together and seeing the picture they portray” (pg 13).
Continue reading »

Biometric Cues

October 26, 2011 in Assessing Individuals

Biometrics cues are uncontrollable bodily reactions to some type of external stimulus. These uncontrollable reactions are caused by the limbic system. When the limbic system perceives something as a threat it sends out a rush of hormones and chemicals that will have an affect on our body. As we get older we start to recognize some of these effects and associate them to emotions. If someone is mad you would expect to see flared nostrils and reddening of the face because that individual is preparing for the freeze, flight or fight response.  The more an individual has to hide their true emotions, the more that individual will stand out. Theses are just a few indicators you would see amongst others that would be very easy to see as well. To the trained observer you can pick up on not only body language but biometric cues as well.
Continue reading »

When Emotions Don’t Fit the Baseline – What the Face Offers

October 13, 2011 in Applying The Observations, Assessing Individuals

**Please note, the video for this post is no longer available.  Please e-mail us directly if you would like more information on this post: training@cp-journal.com **

When we teach our students to read body language during our course, I often encourage students to ignore the face of the person that they are observing.  Why? Because I believe that the face can deceive us more easily than what is shown below the shoulders, and focusing our observation on the body will create a more sound assessment of the meaning of the person’s gestures.  Because of social demands placed on us, we often put conscious effort into controlling our face, which may help a person conceal a true emotion from others not trained to identify the discrepancies.  That is the problem that most concerns me when reading body language, when it is being controlled consciously.
Continue reading »